tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2434448583333099534.post7816471250418162379..comments2024-03-28T07:26:53.635+00:00Comments on Code Singh: SyncToy functionality in RobocopySonyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14712061509750386357noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2434448583333099534.post-42382206702736240262012-09-11T10:17:37.604+01:002012-09-11T10:17:37.604+01:00Hey, you can just use ViceVersa PRO, which is exac...Hey, you can just use ViceVersa PRO, which is exactly that, robocpy + synctoy! see http://www.tgrmn.comAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2434448583333099534.post-38409211049302382672012-07-26T08:22:06.933+01:002012-07-26T08:22:06.933+01:00I'm having the same issue. Unfortunately using...I'm having the same issue. Unfortunately using /XO seems to be contrary to /PURGE?<br />So of course all newer files will be copied appropiately, but deleted files will be "restored". Or am I wrong?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2434448583333099534.post-47811856906900699492011-02-09T16:42:45.739+00:002011-02-09T16:42:45.739+00:00You're right with simulating the Synchronise o...You're right with simulating the Synchronise option by running Robocopy twice. This is described in the Documentation that comes with Robocopy (robocopy.doc) in the "Using Robocopy File Classes" section:<br />"The most appropriate use for /XO is to synchronize two directory trees so that they can be updated simultaneously in separate areas. To ensure that the latest files are present in both directory trees, copy with /XO first in one direction and then in the other."<br /><br />/chAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com